Category: Music Industry

Darling, celebrities are a lot like puzzle pieces — each event, performance, or outfit should fit neatly into the big picture of their public persona. But lately, it feels like some of them have lost the box lid, and we’re left staring at mismatched shapes wondering, what even is going on?

This is where I, Karen — your unfiltered fashion, gossip, and life critic — come in. I’m here to dissect two of the most puzzling celebrity phenomena of 2025: Kanye West’s Sunday Service concerts and Taylor Swift’s Eras tour. These spectacles are like glitter-coated puzzle pieces shoved into boxes they don’t belong to. Sweetie, grab your monocle and let’s take a look.

---

Kanye West’s ‘Sunday Service’ Concert: Gospel Meets Chaos

Kanye West’s Sunday Service concerts have become infamous, darling. They are part spiritual revival, part Kanye theater, and part chaotic spectacle. He took what should be a religious experience and turned it into a multi-hour production — complete with choir singers, gospel renditions of his own hits, and Kanye himself acting like a cross between Moses and the world’s most dramatic MC.

The Background

Launched in January 2019, Sunday Service was Kanye’s attempt to merge music, faith, and community. By 2025, it had evolved into something that defies easy description. These events have been hosted in locations from Coachella to the Coachella desert to stadiums that rival Madison Square Garden. But the spectacle has left audiences scratching their heads.

Public Reception

The response has been mixed, darling. Some attendees call it “a spiritual awakening” — others call it “a very expensive church service with questionable theology.” Critics argue that it’s more spectacle than substance, while fans swear it’s transformative. But Karen? I’m less convinced.

Karen’s Take

“Sweetie, if I wanted to see a spectacle, I’d go to a circus,” I said after watching the last performance streamed online. And it’s true. Kanye’s Sunday Service feels less like a unified piece of art and more like a variety show where the pieces don’t quite match.

From a Karen standpoint, Kanye’s concerts are like ordering a salad and getting dessert, a magic show, and a TED Talk all in one plate — and not in a good way. His blending of gospel with rap and his tendency to deliver impromptu monologues leaves some feeling inspired, but others simply confused.

The Puzzle Problem

The question is: should Sunday Service be a religious experience, a concert, or a celebrity stunt? Kanye seems to want it all, but that’s like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. And when the spectacle overshadows the soul of the event, darling, it’s no longer harmonious — it’s a mismatched puzzle piece.

Karen’s advice? “Kanye, pick a lane, sweetie. Gospel deserves reverence. If you want a spectacle, go headline a circus tent. But don’t try to do both at once.”

---

Taylor Swift’s ‘Eras’ Tour: Nostalgia Meets Commercialism

Now let’s talk about another puzzler: Taylor Swift’s Eras tour. If Kanye’s service is a chaotic gospel puzzle, Taylor’s tour is nostalgia with a side of commercial overload. And yes, darling, Karen has thoughts.

The Background

The Eras tour is Taylor Swift’s ambitious retrospective, designed to celebrate her musical evolution from country sweetheart to pop icon. It spans her entire career, with elaborate stage designs, costume changes, and hours of performance. Fans gush, critics debate, and the internet explodes with discussion.

Public Reception

Many have applauded Taylor for crafting a masterclass in live performance and fan engagement. But others question whether the Eras tour is more about nostalgia than artistry. Some accuse it of being a meticulously packaged commercial event — and Karen tends to agree.

Karen’s Take

“Darling, if I wanted to relive the past, I’d watch reruns of Friends, not a concert,” I say with my usual sharpness. Taylor’s tour is dazzling, yes. But the spectacle comes with a hefty price tag — and plenty of merch.

While her fans swoon over costume changes and setlist surprises, Karen notices that it feels like a puzzle where some pieces are missing. There’s beauty, but there’s also a calculated marketing machine at work. It makes you wonder whether the Eras tour is more about artistry or about selling another wave of merch, deluxe editions, and VIP experiences.

The Puzzle Problem

Taylor’s show is a blend of art and nostalgia, but the commercial element makes it tricky. It’s like trying to fit together puzzle pieces from different boxes: the music and emotional storytelling belong to one puzzle, but the merch and ticket packages belong to another. And sometimes they just don’t match.

Karen’s advice to Taylor? “Sweetie, nostalgia is powerful — but don’t let the commercial glitz overshadow the music. Stick to the art, and the puzzle will fit.”

---

The Bigger Picture: Celebrities and Puzzle Pieces

These two examples — Kanye’s Sunday Service and Taylor’s Eras tour — illustrate something important about modern celebrity culture: events are increasingly becoming mismatched puzzle pieces. Celebrities want spectacle, spirituality, nostalgia, artistry, and profit all in one package. But the truth is, darling, not every piece belongs in the same puzzle.

Karen believes that art, performance, and celebrity culture can be beautiful when each piece has its place. When the pieces clash, however, it leaves us with confusion instead of awe. And that’s exactly what we’ve seen in recent years.

---

Closing Thoughts from Karen

Darling, the celebrity puzzle is complicated, and not every piece fits neatly. Kanye’s Sunday Service is a spectacle without clear boundaries. Taylor Swift’s Eras tour is a dazzling nostalgia trip tangled with commercial ambition. Both are ambitious — and both leave Karen shaking her head.

Sometimes, sweetie, less is more. And in the puzzle of celebrity culture, a missing piece might just be good taste.

Oh, for the love of all that is melodious! This “hit song” ain’t hitting my ear drums right, and frankly, my dear, it’s getting harder and harder to distinguish one from the next. It seems that in the grand symphony of modern music, everyone is playing the same three notes, at the same frantic pace, with lyrics that make me wonder if the dictionary has suddenly become obsolete. Call me a curmudgeon, call me out of touch, but when did “music” become a synonym for “auditory wallpaper” designed to last shorter than my patience for a slow grocery line?

Let’s address the elephant in the room, or rather, the goldfish in the recording studio: the length of these so-called songs. Back in my day, a song had an introduction, a verse, a chorus, a bridge that actually built to something, maybe a guitar solo that didn’t sound like a dying cat, and then a proper outro. It was a journey! Now? You blink, and it’s over. Three minutes, average, they say. Some are barely two minutes! Are they trying to beat a world record for brevity? Is it because attention spans have dwindled to that of a fruit fly? Or is it something more sinister, like the streaming services paying per “stream” after a mere 30 seconds? Ah, the capitalism of cacophony! Short song trends are not just a creative choice; they’re a financial one, robbing us of genuine musical development.

And the production! It’s all so… loud. Every instrument, every vocal, compressed and maximized until there’s no dynamic range left. It’s a sonic assault, not a listening experience. Where’s the nuance? Where’s the space for instruments to breathe, for vocals to soar naturally? Everything is polished to an inch of its life, auto-tuned into robotic perfection, stripped of any raw emotion or human imperfection. It’s like they’re trying to make every song sound like a commercial jingle – loud, in your face, and utterly forgettable once it’s over. This loudness war in music has diminished the quality of our listening experience.

Speaking of forgettable, let’s dissect these lyrics. Good heavens. It’s either endless repetition of a single, often nonsensical phrase, or a laundry list of brand names and vapid boasts. Where are the stories? The poetry? The clever metaphors that made you think, or at least chuckle? Now it’s all “party in the club,” “my money’s long,” and “you look good tonight.” Are these musicians suffering from some kind of collective vocabulary drought? It’s as if they’re writing for TikTok captions, not for actual human connection. And the constant reliance on simple, often predictable rhyme schemes – “love” and “above,” “heart” and “apart.” It’s not just uninspired; it’s insulting to anyone with an ounce of intelligence. Simplified lyrics in pop music are making it increasingly unengaging.

Then there’s the distinct lack of originality. Every “new” artist sounds like a copy of a copy, chasing the last big viral hit. The same four-chord progressions, the same generic beats, the same synth sounds that apparently come pre-packaged with whatever music software they’re all using. Where’s the experimentation? The unique voices? The artists who dared to sound different? It’s a homogenous soup of sameness, all designed to fit neatly into an algorithmic playlist. If I wanted to listen to a computer generate music, I’d ask my smart speaker to do it. At least then I wouldn’t have to pretend it’s “art.” The homogenization of modern music is a genuine concern for discerning listeners.

And the genre blending! While sometimes it can be innovative, more often than not, it just sounds like a confused mess. Pop trying to be country, hip-hop trying to be rock – it’s a chaotic jumble that rarely succeeds in being truly cohesive. It’s as if they’re throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks, hoping to appeal to everyone and ending up appealing to no one particularly well. Give me a good, solid genre, thank you very much. Something I can sink my teeth into, something that has a clear identity. This constant “fusion” often just waters down what makes each genre special.

Let’s not forget the sheer reliance on image over substance. It’s no longer just about the music; it’s about the “persona,” the “brand,” the elaborate music videos that cost more than my house. These artists are more concerned with their social media presence, their fashion choices, and their carefully curated controversies than they are with honing their craft. And the dancing! Oh, the dancing. It’s often just a series of repetitive, uninspired moves designed for a TikTok challenge, rather than genuine choreography that enhances the music. This focus on celebrity branding over musical talent is detrimental to the art form.

The live performances are another sore point. So much auto-tune, so many backing tracks. Are they even singing? Or are they just miming along to a pre-recorded track while prancing around? It’s a sad state of affairs when you pay good money to see an artist live, only to realize you could have had the same experience (and probably better sound) by just listening to their album at home. Where’s the raw energy? The improvisation? The human element that makes live music so thrilling? It seems to have gone the way of common sense. Live music authenticity is a disappearing act.

And the obsession with “viral moments.” Every song seems designed to have a catchy 15-second snippet that can be used on TikTok or Instagram Reels. The entire song is built around this one moment, making the rest of it feel like filler. This isn’t songwriting; it’s soundbite engineering. It’s reducing a complex art form to a series of easily digestible, algorithm-friendly morsels. No wonder songs are getting shorter – why bother with a nuanced narrative when all anyone cares about is the hook that’s going to go viral? The TikTokification of music is reshaping how songs are composed and consumed.

It used to be that music was a form of expression, a reflection of the human experience, a way to tell stories and evoke deep emotions. Now, it feels like a factory line, churning out product after product, all designed to be consumed quickly, discarded, and replaced by the next fleeting sensation. There’s a cynicism to it, a calculated effort to maximize streams and minimize artistic risk.

Perhaps I’m just an old woman yearning for the days of proper melodies, meaningful lyrics, and songs that actually lasted longer than a microwave popcorn cycle. But I truly believe that music is more than just background noise for your social media feed. It’s an art form, and it deserves more respect than it’s currently being given. So, the next time one of these “hit songs” blares through your speakers, listen closely. Ask yourself: Is this truly moving me? Is it challenging me? Or is it just another piece of mass-produced sonic candy, designed to be quickly devoured and forgotten? My ear drums (and my soul) are ready for something more substantial. And I suspect I’m not the only one. The decline of lyrical depth and the rise of algorithmic music are making me want to turn off the radio entirely. Give me a good ol’ record, please.

Alright, settle in, because today’s topic is one that physically pains me. It assaults my ears, rattles my windows, and frequently gives me a headache that even a strong cup of Earl Grey can’t cure. We are talking about music. Or, as I prefer to call it, the sonic scrapheap: modern music’s lack of melody & meaning. My heavens, what have they done to the beautiful art of sound? It’s gone from harmonious delight to a relentless, repetitive racket. It’s a disgrace to instruments, to vocal cords, and to anyone with an ounce of musical discernment, I tell you! Welcome back to The Manager’s Desk: A Daily Dose of Disappointment.

I remember a time, not so long ago, when music was a joy. When a tune could lift your spirits, make you want to tap your foot, or even bring a tear to your eye. When musicians actually played instruments, and singers possessed voices that didn’t need a computer to fix them. Think of the classics: Glenn Miller’s Big Band, the smooth crooning of Frank Sinatra, the soaring elegance of Ella Fitzgerald. That was music. Music you could dance to, music you could sing along to, music with discernible melodies and actual, coherent lyrics. Now? It’s a relentless, pounding beat, muddled vocals, and enough computer-generated noise to power a small city. It’s a pure, unadulterated affront to my sensitive eardrums!

The Repetitive Racket: One Note, All Day Long

Where do I even begin with the sheer monotony? It seems every song, regardless of genre, relies on the same three notes, repeated endlessly, usually accompanied by a thumping bass that vibrates through your very bones. There’s no development, no progression, no melodic journey. It’s just… a loop. A mind-numbing, soul-crushing loop. Whatever happened to a good bridge? To a change of key that sends shivers down your spine? To an instrumental break that actually showcases talent? No, it’s just the same tired phrase, repeated ad nauseam, as if sheer repetition will somehow make it good. It just makes it irritating! My patience wears thin faster than one of those flimsy fast-fashion shirts.

And the “beats”! Oh, the “beats”! They’re so generic, so utterly devoid of any nuance or originality. It’s like they just hit a button on a computer and out comes another generic, soulless track designed to be played in shopping malls. There’s no human touch, no genuine emotion, just manufactured rhythm. It’s an insult to drummers who actually learned how to play a proper rhythm section. It’s all so digital, so devoid of warmth, so utterly unmusical.

The Vocal Vexation: Mumbling, Shouting, and Autotuned Awfulness

And the singing! Or should I say, the lack thereof. Half the time, these “artists” are either mumbling incoherently, as if they’ve forgotten the words to their own songs, or they’re shouting aggressively into the microphone. You can’t understand a single word they’re saying, and even if you could, it’s usually about something utterly nonsensical or, more often, utterly vulgar. The lyrics! Good heavens, the lyrics! They’re either painfully simplistic, about fleeting romances and “good vibes,” or so obscure they make no sense at all. Where’s the storytelling? Where’s the emotion? Where’s the poetry that makes you think, or the clever wordplay that makes you smile? It’s just blunt force trauma to the ears.

And the autotune! Oh, the omnipresent autotune! Singers who can’t hold a note in real life are suddenly pitch-perfect on recordings, thanks to a machine. Whatever happened to raw talent, to a powerful voice that didn’t need computer assistance? It’s cheating, that’s what it is! It’s an insult to singers who actually spent years honing their craft, who could command a stage with nothing but their voice and a microphone. Now, everyone sounds like a robot trying to sing in a tin can. It’s a pure degradation of genuine vocal artistry. It’s like painting by numbers and calling yourself Picasso!

The Instrument Impasse: Where Have All the Musicians Gone?!

And the instruments! Or, again, the lack thereof. Whatever happened to a proper orchestra? To a well-played guitar solo that sends shivers down your spine? To a soulful saxophone riff? No, it’s all synthesizers and digital samples now. It sounds like they’ve just pulled snippets of noise from a vast library, cobbled them together, and called it a “composition.” There’s no genuine musicianship, no interplay between talented individuals, just programmed sounds.

It’s disheartening to see how few young people are learning proper instruments now. Why bother, when a computer can do it all for you? It’s robbing them of the discipline, the creativity, and the sheer joy that comes from creating music with your own two hands. It’s turning music into a factory-produced commodity, rather than an organic, living art form. It’s sterile, it’s cold, and it’s utterly devoid of soul.

The Concert Catastrophe: Sensory Overload and Empty Spectacle

And these “concerts”! Oh, the sheer agony of attending one. They’re not concerts; they’re spectacles designed to assault every one of your senses simultaneously. Blaring lights, smoke machines, enormous video screens showing close-ups of every pore, and ear-splitting volume that makes your teeth vibrate and your head pound. You can barely hear the singer over the incessant bass, and half the time they’re just prancing around anyway, not actually singing, or worse, lip-syncing for goodness sake!

And the tickets! They cost an arm and a leg! For what? To stand in a crowd of sweaty teenagers and pretend you’re having a good time while your eardrums slowly disintegrate? No thank you. I’d rather listen to a nice vinyl record at home, with a cup of tea and my knitting. That’s real music appreciation. You can hear every instrument, every subtle nuance. You can actually enjoy the music, rather than just enduring a sensory overload. These modern concerts are just another excuse for exhibitionism and technological excess. It’s a sad reflection of an industry that values flash over substance. It’s a pure assault, not a performance.

The Ubiquitous Noise: A Constant Auditory Assault on Decency

And the sheer ubiquity of this noise! It’s everywhere! In the shops, in the gym, in restaurants. Even when you’re just trying to enjoy a quiet walk in the park, someone’s blasting their dreadful music from a portable speaker. Have they no consideration for others? Have they no concept of personal space, or the simple courtesy of keeping their racket to themselves? It’s an auditory assault, a constant barrage of unwanted sound that permeates every aspect of modern life. My ears yearn for the sweet sounds of nature, or the gentle hum of polite conversation, not a relentless, pounding beat.

And these kids today with their “headphones” glued to their ears, blasting that racket. No wonder they can’t hear anything. They’re deafening themselves! It’s a tragedy, really. A very preventable tragedy. They’re missing out on the sounds of the world, on the nuances of life, all for the sake of loud, repetitive noise. They walk around in a little bubble of self-imposed auditory pollution, oblivious to everything around them. It’s truly disheartening to witness. And when you try to speak to them, they can’t hear you! It’s infuriating!

The Manager’s Verdict: A Plea for Melody and Meaning!

So, here’s my earnest plea: Bring back proper music! Bring back melody, harmony, and instruments you can actually hear. Turn down the volume, get rid of the autotune, and for goodness sake, put some clothes on! Focus on talent, not just spectacle. Demand real musicianship, real voices, and real songs that have something meaningful to say, or at least a tune that’s pleasant to the ear.

Give me a song that stirs the soul, a tune that makes me tap my foot without giving me a migraine. Music that truly inspires, not just assaults the senses. It’s a testament to how far we’ve fallen that I even have to make this argument. Music is one of life’s great joys, but they’ve managed to turn it into a loud, messy, and often vulgar chore.

Someone, please, speak to the manager of the music industry and tell them to focus on quality, not just quantity of noise! And while you’re at it, tell them to turn down the bass. It’s not too much to ask for, is it? Honestly! My ears are still ringing just thinking about it. I think I’ll go put on some Vera Lynn. Now that’s music. And perhaps some classical. A proper symphony. That would be a true balm for my wounded ears.

Alright, settle in, settle in, because today’s topic hits me right in the eardrums, and frankly, right in the soul. We are talking about music, or rather, the depressing state of what passes for music in the modern age. It’s a monotonous, repetitive wasteland filled with fleeting moments of lukewarm success and a shocking lack of depth. It’s modern music’s monotony: one-hit wonders and the death of the album, and someone, by golly, needs to speak to the entire record industry! Welcome back to The Manager’s Desk: A Daily Dose of Disappointment.

I remember a time when music was an art form. When artists poured their souls into creating entire albums, carefully curated collections of songs that told a story, explored a theme, or showcased a range of talent. You’d buy a record, listen to it from start to finish, and discover new favorites with every listen. Think of the classics: Fleetwood Mac’s “Rumours,” Carole King’s “Tapestry,” The Beatles’ “Sgt. Pepper’s.” Those were albums! Now? It’s a relentless churn of disposable singles, designed to go viral for precisely five minutes before being replaced by the next equally bland offering. It’s a disgrace to true musicianship, I tell you. A pure, unadulterated affront to my discerning ear and my love of true artistry!

The One-Hit Wonder Whirlwind: Here Today, Gone This Afternoon

Where do I even begin with the sheer fleetingness of modern musical success? It seems every week there’s a new “chart-topping” song that’s ubiquitous for about five minutes, played relentlessly on every radio station and in every shopping mall, until suddenly, it vanishes without a trace. These “artists” are here today and gone this afternoon, never to be heard from again. My goodness, they have all the staying power of a dandelion puff in a hurricane!

They pour all their efforts into a single, highly produced, autotuned track, designed for immediate viral appeal, rather than cultivating a lasting body of work. And then, when it’s over, they’re just… gone. Whatever happened to longevity? To artists who built careers spanning decades, producing consistent quality, evolving their sound, and genuinely connecting with their audience over time? Now, it’s all about the quick buck, the fleeting moment of fame, and then straight to the sonic scrapheap. It’s a sad reflection of an industry that values transient trends over enduring artistry. It’s a shame, because sometimes you hear a young person with a genuinely good voice, only for them to disappear after one mediocre dance track.

The Death of the Album: A Collection of Random Noise

And the album itself! Oh, the tragedy of its demise. Albums used to be cohesive works, a testament to an artist’s vision. Each song flowed into the next, creating a complete listening experience. Now? An “album” is just a collection of singles, thrown together haphazardly, often with little to no thematic connection or musical coherence. It’s like a random playlist compiled by a bewildered squirrel.

Artists release a “lead single” to generate buzz, then perhaps another two or three, and then they tack on a bunch of filler tracks that sound suspiciously like B-sides that weren’t good enough for anything else. There’s no sense of journey, no grand artistic statement. It’s just a grab-bag of noise designed to maximize streaming numbers and get on more “playlists” – whatever those are. It’s an insult to the very concept of an album as a work of art. It reduces creative output to a purely commercial endeavor, and it’s ruining the very soul of music. I yearn for the days when you’d sit down with a record cover, read the liner notes, and truly immerse yourself in an artist’s world. Now, it’s just a file on a phone.

The Over-Production Pandemonium: Too Many Buttons, Not Enough Soul

And the production! Oh, the relentless over-production! Every track is so polished, so slick, so perfectly engineered that it sounds utterly sterile. Layers upon layers of synthesized sounds, digital effects, and computer-generated beats that overwhelm any genuine human element. It’s like they’ve taken a perfectly good song and then smothered it with so much technological syrup that you can’t taste the original flavor.

Whatever happened to raw, authentic sound? To instruments that actually sounded like instruments, played by human beings with skill and feeling? Now, everything sounds processed, artificial, and utterly devoid of warmth or soul. It’s a reflection of our fear of imperfection, our obsession with flawless surfaces, and our inability to appreciate the beauty of a genuine, unadorned performance. It’s turning music into a factory-produced commodity, rather than an organic, living art form. It’s cold, it’s mechanical, and it’s utterly devoid of genuine emotion. It’s a sonic Frankenstein’s monster, cobbled together from bits and bytes, with no true heartbeat.

The Sampling Scourge & The Lack of Originality

And the sampling! Oh, the endless sampling! It seems every other song just takes a snippet from an old classic, slaps a new beat over it, and calls it “original.” It’s lazy, it’s uninspired, and it’s a blatant lack of creativity. Whatever happened to writing your own melodies? To coming up with your own original hooks? It’s like they’re admitting they can’t come up with anything good on their own, so they just steal from the past and hope no one notices.

It’s a testament to the lack of originality in modern music. They recycle old ideas, repackage them in a louder, more aggressive format, and then call it “innovative.” It’s not innovation; it’s plagiarism with a new beat. And the lyrics are either ridiculously shallow, about fleeting romances and “good vibes,” or so obscure they make no sense at all. Where’s the poetry? Where’s the storytelling? Where’s the subtle wit that made you smile? It’s just blunt force trauma to the ears and the brain.

The Manager’s Verdict: A Plea for Artistry and Authenticity!

So, why all this railing against modern music? Because, my dear readers, music should be a source of joy, inspiration, and genuine connection. It should uplift, provoke thought, or simply provide a beautiful melody. Instead, it has become a disposable commodity, a monotonous backdrop to our increasingly frantic lives, devoid of the very elements that made it special in the first place.

My earnest plea: Bring back true artistry! Bring back genuine musicianship, compelling melodies, and cohesive albums that tell a story. Turn off the autotune, reduce the relentless repetition, and for goodness sake, encourage artists to create something truly original and enduring! Demand depth over shallowness, quality over quantity, and genuine soul over artificial polish.

At The Manager’s Desk, we will continue to highlight the absurdity of this sonic scrapheap, to lament the death of the album, and to demand a return to common sense and genuine musical integrity. Because if we don’t speak up, who will? Will we just let them drown us in an endless stream of one-hit wonders and monotonous beats? Not on my watch!

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I think I’ll go put on some proper classical music. A symphony, perhaps. Something with actual instruments and a real composer. A true balm for my wounded ears, and a reminder of what music used to be. The sheer bliss!

There are certain expectations one has when Browse the sensible shoe department at a reputable retailer. One expects quiet carpeting, helpful staff, and the gentle, unobtrusive sound ofinoffensive background music. Perhaps a little Michael Bublé, if they’re feeling adventurous.

You can imagine my shock, then, when my search for a practical yet stylish loafer was interrupted by the sound of a young woman singing on the store’s sound system. She had a pleasant enough voice, I suppose, but the words she was singing caused me to nearly drop a very sensible wedge heel. In a disturbingly cheerful tone, she was detailing a fantasy about murdering her ex-boyfriend and his new girlfriend, all because her heart was broken.

“I might kill my ex,” the voice cooed, “not the best idea.”

Not the best idea? My dear lady, that is a profound understatement. It is a terrible idea. It is a felony. I looked around, expecting to see similar looks of alarm on the faces of my fellow shoppers. Instead, a young sales associate was humming along. Humming along to a murder confession set to a catchy beat. It was at that moment I knew I had stumbled upon a cultural phenomenon that required my immediate and unwavering attention. That song, I later learned, was called “Kill Bill,” and it was the crown jewel of SZA’s chart-topping, critically acclaimed album, SOS. Well, I have listened to the entire 23-track ordeal, and I am here to tell you that the album is aptly named. It is, without a doubt, a distress signal.

A General Grievance: The Lack of Musical Cohesion

Before I even address the scandalous lyrical content, we must first discuss the chaotic structure of this album. Listening to SOS from start to finish is like channel-surfing during a thunderstorm. One moment, it’s a smooth, mellow R&B song. The next, it’s a jarring, guitar-driven pop-punk tirade that sounds like it was recorded in a teenager’s garage. Then it shifts to a mournful ballad, then to something approaching rock, then back again.

What genre is SZA’s SOS? That is a question many people are asking, and the answer, it seems, is “all of them.” The creators and fans of this album call this “genre-bending” and “versatile.” I call it what it is: a mess. It’s musically indecisive. It’s as if the young woman couldn’t settle on a single sound or mood, so she simply threw every idea she had at the wall to see what would stick. The result is a jarring, overlong, and deeply unfocused collection of tracks that gives the listener whiplash. A proper album should have a point of view, a sonic throughline. This album has about seventeen of them, all competing for attention.

A Formal Complaint Regarding Lyrical Indecency

Now, let us move on to the primary offense: the lyrics. I was raised in an era where singers—especially female singers—maintained a certain level of decorum. They wrote about love and heartbreak with poetry, metaphor, and a sense of quiet dignity. This album has none of that. It is a 68-minute exercise in over-sharing, with lyrics that range from the deeply unsettling to the frankly inappropriate.

Exhibit A: “Kill Bill” We must start here, as it is the most egregious example. I understand the concept of hyperbole. I know what artistic license is. But there is a line, and cheerfully singing about a double homicide crosses it, circles it, and then sets it on fire. The song is presented as a relatable anthem of heartbreak. What part of this is relatable? The uncontrollable jealousy? The homicidal ideation? This isn’t a heartbroken woman; it’s a villain from a television crime drama. Has anyone checked on the ex-boyfriend? Is he safe? The casual way this song was embraced by the public is a deeply worrying sign of our society’s moral decay.

Exhibit B: The Unladylike Language and Themes Beyond the homicidal fantasies, the album is littered with the kind of explicit language and TMI (Too Much Information) content that would make a sailor blush. There is a constant, exhausting vacillation between aggressive, boastful proclamations and cripplingly insecure confessions. One moment she is bragging about her romantic prowess in a most unseemly manner, the next she is whining about being ignored by a man. The emotional landscape of this album is not complex; it’s just unstable. What ever happened to maintaining a little mystery? A little self-respect? This isn’t vulnerability; it’s a public therapy session without the benefit of a licensed professional.

An Analysis of the So-Called “Hit Songs”

Even the album’s most celebrated tracks are, upon closer inspection, deeply flawed.

Take “Snooze,” for instance. It’s a slow, romantic-sounding song that many consider a highlight. But if you listen to the lyrics, it’s a ballad about a codependent relationship of alarming intensity. She sings that being away from this man is “a snooze,” implying her life has no meaning or interest without him. My dear, that is not romantic; that is a cry for help. You need a hobby. You need a book club. You need an identity outside of your romantic partner. This isn’t a love song; it’s an ode to losing oneself entirely.

Then there’s “Good Days,” a song that, on the surface, sounds dreamy and optimistic. It has a pleasant, sunny disposition. But the lyrics are about a desperate attempt to talk oneself out of inner turmoil and “silly arguments” in her head. It’s not a song about actually having a good day; it’s a song about the immense effort required to not have a bad one. It’s profoundly sad, dressed up in a deceptively cheerful package.

What Happened to Real Soul Music?

Listening to SOS made me yearn for the R&B and soul singers of my youth. When Aretha Franklin demanded “R.E.S.P.E.C.T.,” it was a powerful, dignified anthem for a generation. When Gladys Knight sang about leaving on a “Midnight Train to Georgia,” you felt the weight of her decision, the quiet strength in her heartbreak. There was elegance, power, and restraint.

This album, by contrast, feels like it has none of that. It replaces soulful power with shouted insecurities and poetic subtlety with shocking, explicit confessions. The artistry of the past was in conveying deep emotion through masterful songwriting and vocal control. The “artistry” here seems to be in just how raw and unfiltered one can be. It’s a race to the bottom of lyrical decorum.

The Final Verdict: An SOS Indeed

Ultimately, the album’s title is the most accurate thing about it. It truly is an SOS. It’s a distress signal from a talented but deeply troubled young artist. It’s a chaotic, indulgent, and emotionally exhausting cry for help that masquerades as a groundbreaking musical statement.

My final verdict is this: while I can acknowledge the young lady has a unique voice, the vessel for that voice is a hot mess. The album is too long, too unfocused, and far too concerned with shocking the listener. I am sending out my own SOS to the music industry: please, let’s bring back a little class, a little subtlety, and a lot less talk about killing our exes. My nerves, and the institution of popular music, simply cannot take much more.

There are certain sounds that one expects to disrupt a peaceful afternoon. A neighbor’s lawnmower, perhaps. The distant wail of an ambulance. The over-enthusiastic bark of a nearby beagle. I am prepared for these minor disturbances. What I was not prepared for was the sonic assault that recently emanated from my granddaughter’s bedroom, an unholy racket that rattled my bone china and curdled the milk in my tea.

It began with a guitar riff so distorted and aggressive it sounded like it was being played with a power tool. This was immediately followed by what I can only describe as a young lady shouting. Not singing, mind you. Shouting. It was a tirade of teenage grievances set to a drumbeat that can best be compared to someone falling down a flight of stairs with a collection of pots and pans.

“What on earth is that noise?” I called out, my voice tight with disapproval.

“It’s GUTS!” my granddaughter shouted back with reverence. “The new Olivia Rodrigo album! Isn’t it amazing?”

Amazing was not the word I would have chosen. After being subjected to the entire album on a torturous car ride to the garden center, I have emerged, dazed but resolute, with a full report. Someone needs to provide a mature, sensible, and thoroughly unimpressed perspective on this so-called musical masterpiece, and it appears that task has fallen to me. So consider this my formal review. I’ve listened to GUTS, and frankly, my primary grievance is with the sheer volume of it all.

My First Complaint: The Noise Level is Unacceptable

Before we even touch upon the lyrical content—and believe me, we will get to that melodrama—we must first address the sound. What has happened to the concept of melody? Of dynamics? Of a song that builds and breathes, with quiet moments and loud moments? This album seems to have been produced with one single philosophy: everything must be at maximum volume, all the time.

The quieter songs, the so-called ballads, offer a brief respite before they, too, inevitably crescendo into a caterwaul of crashing cymbals and shrieking vocals. Listening to GUTS from start to finish is not a pleasant musical journey. It is an endurance test. It is the auditory equivalent of being stuck in a room with a malfunctioning smoke alarm while someone repeatedly slams a car door outside.

The “rock” elements everyone seems so proud of sound less like the clever guitar work of a bygone era and more like a tantrum happening in a music store. There is no nuance, no subtlety. It is all raw, frayed nerve endings presented as art. Frankly, if I want to experience that level of chaotic noise, I can simply visit a middle school cafeteria during lunchtime. I do not need to pay for the privilege on a streaming service.

A Lyrical Investigation: A Deep Dive into Over-Sharing

Once my ears adjusted to the initial sonic shock, I attempted to focus on the lyrics. The album’s title, GUTS, is apparently meant to signify honesty and bravery in songwriting. From what I can gather, however, it mostly seems to signify a complete and utter lack of a private, internal monologue. Every fleeting thought, every minor social embarrassment, every romantic slight is broadcast with the subtlety of a foghorn.

Exhibit A: “vampire” This was the first single I was made aware of, a song about a “fame-sucker” who used her for her status. A “bloodsucker.” For a moment, I thought it was a clever song about an actual vampire, which would have at least been interesting. But no. It is, of course, about a boy. A boy who, as the song painstakingly details, dated her for a mere six months.

Six months! My dear young lady, I have jars of jam in my pantry with a longer shelf life than that relationship. To write a three-and-a-half-minute power ballad of such operatic drama over a dalliance that lasted half a year is, frankly, absurd. It’s a testament to the modern teenager’s flair for the dramatic, and a worrying sign of what they consider to be a major life event.

Exhibit B: “ballad of a homeschooled girl” In this particular track, Miss Rodrigo laments her social awkwardness. She sings of tripping over her own feet, telling jokes that don’t land, and feeling like a “social suicide.” My diagnosis? She lacks basic social graces and seems to blame everyone but herself.

Instead of seeing her awkwardness as a personal failing to be worked on—perhaps by reading a book, practicing conversation, or simply watching where she puts her feet—she presents it as some kind of tragic, universal condition. “I hate all my friends,” she declares. Well, dear, after listening to you complain about them in a hit song, I can assure you the feeling is probably mutual.

Exhibit C: “pretty isn’t pretty” Here we have the obligatory song about the pressures of modern beauty standards. She can’t look in the mirror, she bought makeup she doesn’t need, and feels she’ll never be good enough. While the sentiment is understandable, the execution is pure navel-gazing. Women of my generation had real problems to contend with. We didn’t have time to write a song because we felt a bit insecure after scrolling through a telephone screen. We had to get on with it. This constant lyrical self-analysis feels less like a profound statement and more like a diary entry that should have remained private.

A Lack of True Songwriting Craft

The central issue with GUTS is that it mistakes raw confession for crafted songwriting. Where is the poetry? Where is the metaphor that isn’t glaringly obvious? I think of the great songwriters of my youth. Carole King could write about heartbreak in “It’s Too Late” with a world-weary grace that made it universal. Joni Mitchell could paint a picture with words in “A Case of You” that was both deeply personal and artistically brilliant. They transformed their pain into poetry.

This album simply documents pain, often in the most literal terms imaginable. In “get him back!”, she vacillates between wanting to kiss a boy and wanting to key his car. This isn’t presented with any sense of irony or cleverness; it’s just a statement of conflicting, juvenile impulses. It doesn’t tell me a story; it tells me this young woman needs to make up her mind and perhaps enroll in an anger management class.

The Final Verdict: All Guts, No Real Glory

After careful consideration and a full bottle of aspirin, my verdict is in. Is the album energetic? Yes, in the way a toddler who has eaten too much sugar is energetic. Is it honest? Yes, in the way a poorly written diary is honest. But is it good music? Is it a work of lasting artistic merit? Absolutely not.

It is an album of pure id—a loud, repetitive, and lyrically immature collection of grievances. It is all guts, no glory. It’s a musical tantrum that mistakes volume for passion and over-sharing for bravery.

My final recommendation is that someone ought to buy this young lady a nice cup of chamomile tea and a journal—a paper one, with a lock on it. As for the album, I’ll be filing a formal complaint with the local noise department. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to put on some Frank Sinatra to remind myself what a true vocalist sounds like. The palate must be cleansed.